Huge, YUUUGEE! Yes, the tweet is absolutely right. The fraud goes to the highest levels, even in the Supreme Court.... Texas was told their case had no-standing, no merit (e.g. their citizens were not harmed), by the fraudulent vote tallying in other states. Well, wait now, I think the federal government is over all the states, ergo if the leader was fraudulently selected by other states, you'll have to 'splain to me how that DOESN'T impact Texas residents? Given hindsight and the border issue, once again we need to revisit the argument the court used to declare no-standing on the matter! It was either a horribly corrupt decision, or the barrister has no business adjudicating due to ignorance.... Roberts can pick which crime he'd like to stand trial for.
And yet 99% of the idiots think that judges ruled AGAINST the evidence...rather than just rejecting the case outright as they ALL DID.
ReplyDeleteHuge, YUUUGEE!
DeleteYes, the tweet is absolutely right. The fraud goes to the highest levels, even in the Supreme Court....
Texas was told their case had no-standing, no merit (e.g. their citizens were not harmed), by the fraudulent vote tallying in other states.
Well, wait now, I think the federal government is over all the states, ergo if the leader was fraudulently selected by other states, you'll have to 'splain to me how that DOESN'T impact Texas residents? Given hindsight and the border issue, once again we need to revisit the argument the court used to declare no-standing on the matter! It was either a horribly corrupt decision, or the barrister has no business adjudicating due to ignorance.... Roberts can pick which crime he'd like to stand trial for.
Bullseye.
ReplyDelete